Add new comment

Comment: 

CDPH's argument for suppression of their guidance document is not convincing. The industry
is not public interest, it is private interest. Any time you're confused on that, try using their service
without paying. If CDPH's assessment of the evidence base convinces them warnings
are appropriate, they should issue them. CDPH's decision smells of caving to industry
intimidation or political pressure.
Studies funded by telecommunications industry substantially less likely to find effects on health:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/" title="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/";https://www.ncbi....
However: no increase in brain cancer incidence in Australia as cell phone use increased exponentially:
https://cdn.theconversation.com/files/82134/width754/image-20150519-2540... title="https://cdn.theconversation.com/files/82134/width754/image-20150519-2540......
Jon Krueger
 

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.