Tobacco Center Faculty Blog

August 1, 2014

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Lisa Heinzerling, the Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Professor of Law, Georgetown Law just posted an amazing essay on the blog of the American Constitution Society that explores the logical consequences of the Obama Administration's use of a "consumer surplus" discount to the benefits of not using tobacco.
 
This is a must-read piece that illustrates just how silly (and obscene) what the While House is doing under the guise of economic cost-benefit analysis.
 
Here's what she had to say:

July 31, 2014

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Lauren Lempert and I just submitted this public comment to FDA on the deeming rule.  The tracking number is1jy-8djc-8rr2.
 
            The FDA should not use the results of any Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA, also known as cost-benefit analysis) when determining the scope and content of the final rule for four reasons: 
 

July 30, 2014

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

This ad is running in Variety today and Hollywood Reporter next week.
 
See the ad at and supporting information at http://www.smokefreemovies.ucsf.edu/ourads/ad_sfm98.htm

 

July 27, 2014

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

My UCSF colleagues just submitted this comment to FDA:
 
FDA should prohibit of use of flavors in deemed tobacco products as part of the current rulemaking
 
Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0189
 
Elizabeth Couch, RDH, MS, Benjamin Chaffee DDS, MPH, PhD, Gwen Essex, RDH, MS, EdD, Margaret Walsh, RDH, MS, EdD
 
School of Dentistry
University of California San Francisco
 
July 28, 2014
 
Page 23147 of the proposed Rule the FDA states: “The prohibition against characterizing flavors established in the Tobacco Control Act applies to cigarettes only. Consequently, when this regulation is finalized and other tobacco products are deemed subject to FDA’s tobacco product authority, the statutory prohibition against characterizing flavors will not apply automatically to those deemed products (147).”  
 
The FDA specifically states that they may establish a product standard prohibiting flavors in those products only after the rule has been established and requests information and data that would support establishing such a standard (147).
 

July 23, 2014

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

This is yet another example of the Obama White House OMB watering down the FDA's proposed deeming rule in a way that seriously harms public health.  FDA wanted to end non-face-to-face sales, which would have ended internet sales of tobacco products (including, but not limited to ecigarettes).  The OMB deleted this action and replaced it with a limited vending machine restriction.  Here is the public comment we submitted on this issue:
 
FDA Should Prohibit All Non-Face-to-Face (Including Internet) Sales of Tobacco Products as FDA Originally Proposed to the OMB
 
Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0189

Pages