April 24, 2019
The journal Nicotine and Tobacco Research is soliciting papers to support e-cigarettes for harm reduction as the ethical thing to do.
The call (reproduced below) frames the question the need to address the fact that “The tobacco control field has become deeply divided over the question of how to respond to the advent of e-cigarettes, vaporizers and other non-combustible nicotine products.” They also say that “Papers are intended to be illuminating to the current discussions around harm reduction and may contribute to some extent to a re-unification of the field, or at least to further clarification of the current disagreements and of what would be required for moving towards consensus or compromise.” But, far from offering a neutrally worded call to debate the issues around e-cigarettes, it accepts, without question, the assertions that e-cigarettes are beneficial, at least for adults, and hedges on the overwhelming evidence of harm to youth.
April 24, 2019
The law firm Churchwell White LLP filed suit April 4, 2019 on behalf of 25 California jurisdictions challenging the California Bureau of Cannabis Control's regulation provision, adopted in December 2018, forcing local jurisdictions to allow delivery of cannabis in their communities. The Public Health Institute and other organizations protested this change as violating the letter and spirit of Proposition 64, which legalized adult-use cannabis and the implementing legislation (MAUCRSA), both of which assured local control. They are seeking additional jurisdictions to join the suit.
These state regulations undermine the autonomy not only of communities with bans in place, but also communities that rightly adopted public health oriented restrictions on products that appeal to youth like cannabis orange soda or mango flavored vaping fluid, whose residents will no longer be protected, or who have stores but opted to not allow delivery, or who limited the number of outlets intentionally, or who taxed high potency products at a higher rates, for example.
April 23, 2019
As I reported in a previous blog post, Altria (Philip Morris) and its sidekick Juul are blitzing the country trying to preempt effective Tobacco 21 legislation. There have been two changes since my earlier posting: (1) The big health groups (Heart, Lung, Cancer et al) have unified behind strong legislation that includes meaningful enforcement and is specific in not preempting (taking away) the rights of localities to pass and enforce their own strong bills (but are still supporting bad bills in Washington and Texas), and (2) Mitch McConnell, US Senate Majority Leader and staunch industry ally has announced that he will be introducing a national Tobacco 21 bill.
In the States
April 22, 2019
The South Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare has found 50 percent or more of Korea's most popular TV dramas, movies and online animated shows feature tobacco imagery, Korea Times reports. The government's survey covered media releases between January 2017 and June 2018.
"Children and adolescents exposed to smoking scenes repeatedly are more likely to try smoking," a ministry official observed. "We urge entertainment content creators and producers to refrain from showing smoking in content rated for minors."
South Korea is one of 181 parties to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Article 13 of the FCTC calls on governments to end tobacco promotion in entertainment media. South Korea's media industry ranks among the world's largest, with an active export market in Asia.
April 22, 2019
Today the California Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program launched its latest response to the e-cigarette epidemic with the strongest message so far, Nicotine = Brain Poison. The campaign includes very strong media as well as print. My favorite detail is the use of two Juul’s to make up the equal sign in the print ads.
Here is the summary of the facts behind the campaign, which has been added to the Department’s outstanding wwwFlavorsHookKids.org website.