Tobacco Center Faculty Blog

May 30, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

We have shown that 30 minutes of exposure to secondhand smoke at levels about like experienced in a bar damage and compromise the functioning of arteries in a way that increases the likelihood of a heart attack.
Recently Paul Frey and others here at UCSF published a paper examining what happened to the ability of arteries to function at lowere levels of secondhand smoke.  We exposed healthy people to a range of relatively low concentrations of aged secondhand smoke (SHS), similar to those encountered commonly in the community and found that short-term exposure to real-world levels of aged SHS for 30 min resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in endothelial function as measured by how well arteries dilated in response to demands for increased blood flow (flow-mediated dilation).
There was no evidence of a threshold for this effect, i.e., it was detected even as the exposures of SHS went down.

This study adds to the evidence that even a little secondhand smoke is dangerous.

May 29, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

The No on 29 campaign is a great example of the kind of "tobacco industry interference" that the WHO is highlighting in its materials for World No Tobacco Day.

The WHO's list of "Information sheet on tobacco industry interference" could have been written about the No on 29 campaign: 
1. Manoeuvering to hijack the political and legislative process
The tobacco industry has been highly resourceful in undermining governments’ efforts to protect public health. Tobacco companies have become expert in creating and exploiting legislative loopholes and manoeuvering with lobbyists to effectively influence law-making.

2. Exaggerating the economic importance of the industry

May 29, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Philip Morris and Reynolds American's "third party" spokespeople are talking out of both sides of their mouths on whether or not Prop 29 is "inflexible." 

On one hand, in the No on 29 ballot argument they criticize Prop 29 as "Establish[ing] another flawed auto-pilot spending mandate" that "createsan unaccountable, government bureaucracy"  filled with political appointees" because the Legislature has no control over the use of the funds for the first 15 years.

But then, in response to the CDC's report that most states are not appropriating the CDC's recommended levels of support for tobacco control, the No campaign told the Sacramento Bee, "said the CDC study just proves government can't be trusted with more tobacco tax money."

May 29, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Many people have been asking me why the Yes on 29 people have not been running an ad directly confronting Philip Morris and Reynolds' claims about the initiative.  I have certainly shared that view.

Well, the Yes people now have released such an ad.  Check it out here.

May 29, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Many people have been asking me why the Yes on 29 people have not been running an ad directly confronting Philip Morris and Reynolds' claims about the initiative.  Well, the Yes people now have release such an ad.  Check it out here.

Pages