November 24, 2014
I just submitted this comment to FDA. The tracking number is 1jy-8fp3-7yii.
FDA should require that all communications from tobacco manufacturers regarding MRTPs be done in a way that narrowly target smokers
Docket ID: FDA-2014-N-1051
Stanton A. Glantz, PhD
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
University of California San Francisco
November 25, 2014
November 24, 2014
We just submitted this comment to FDA. The tracking number is 1jy-8fp2-y90f.
Swedish Match’s Consumer Perception Study Provides No Evidence for the Population-Level Effects of Modified Snus Labels
Docket ID: FDA-2014-N-1051
Lucy Popova, PhD & Stanton A. Glantz, PhD
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
University of California San Francisco
November 24, 2014
According to the Modified Risk Tobacco Product Applications Guidance for the Industry, “FDA shall issue an order under section 911(g)(1) of the FD&C Act (risk modification order) only if it determines the applicant has demonstrated that the product, as it is actually used by consumers, will:
November 24, 2014
We submitted this public comment to FDA in response to Swedish Match's request to change the warning labels on snus. The tracking number is 1jy-8fp2-j9pp.
“Swedish Experience” extolled in this MRTP application is not transferrable to the US because of the dual use with cigarettes and differences in the tobacco advertising environment
Docket ID: FDA-2014-N-1051
Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, Lucy Popova, PhD, & Lauren K. Lempert, JD MPH
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
University of California San Francisco
November 25, 2014
November 19, 2014
UC tuition debate: Governor Brown should restore the California dream, not keep strangling higher ed
November 18, 2014
This is the testimony I plan to give at the University of California Regents meeting today on the proposed 25% tuition increases:
My name is Stanton Glantz. I am a UCSF professor, past chair of the Systemwide Committee on Planning and Budget, and vice president of the Council of UC Faculty Association.
You are debating these proposed tuition increases for one simple reason:
When Governor Brown took office he slashed higher ed.
Even now, a few years into Governor Brown's 'modest funding increases,' he still spends less on UC and CSU than Arnold Schwarzenegger did his final year as Governor.
You should not be arguing how much to raise tuition, but how to mobilize the public support to restore the California Master plan of low cost high quality higher education for all.
Returning to 2001-2002, before the massive tuition increases, returning per-student funding to where it was then, and making room for the thousands of students that have been forced out of the system would cost the median California family just $50 a year.
We call on you to fight to restore the California dream.