Warning message

Could not find a Solr index corresponding to your website and environment. Your subscription contains these indexes: BEHL-170847.01live.tkssra6146. To fix this problem, please read our documentation.

Tobacco Center Faculty Blog

February 5, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

On September 20, 2007, after a multi-year debate the UC Regents adopted a compromise policy on acceptance of money for research from the tobacco industry.  While then-President Robert Dynes, with the support of the Academic Senate, defeated the proposal by then-Chairman of the Board of Regents Richard Blum to establish a policy of not accepting tobacco industry funding, the Regents did adopt a policy (known as RE-89) that recognized that money from the tobacco industry was problematic and required that any new proposals to the tobacco industry undergo additional internal peer review and that the campus chancellor personally approve any such proposal.  It also required that the President make an annual report to the Regents on any new tobacco industry grants.

According to UC President Yudof's most recent report, since then there has not been a single new tobacco industry grant within the entire University of California.

There are only two remaining grants (that date from before RE-89), totaling $2.9 million, both from Philip Morris USA:

February 5, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Our first effort to webcast the symposium garnered a lot of positive feedback.  We have turned it into a podcast, which you can watch it by clicking here.

The podcast has an index showing the presentation slides, so you can skip to specific talks if you don't want to watch the whole thing.

 

January 30, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Five US Senators -- Frank Lautenberg, Dick Durbin, Tom Harkin, Sherrod Brown, and Richard Blumenthal -- have written a letter to the FDA Commissioner urging the FDA to get the lead out and start effectively protecting consumers.

Among other things, the senators pointed out that, "cigarette companies continue to deceptively market their products, misleading consumers about the health consequences that come from smoking.  For example, American Spirit Cigarettes, made by Reynolds American subsidiary the Sante Fe Natural Tobacco Company, claim to be 'natural' and 'organic,' implying that these cigarettes are better for smokers' health.  Likewise, Philip Morris Company sells Marlboro Smooths as well as Virgina Slims, whose names have similar 'healthy' connotations.  Additionally, companies use colors to suggest that some cigarettes are safer.  Marlboro now uses Gold and Silver as code for 'light' and 'ultra light.'"

These concerns mirror increasing frustration I am hearing broadly across the health community.

January 14, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

UC President Mark Yudof has written the chancellors of all 10 UC campuses instructing them to develop and implement smokefree policies by 2014.  (UCSF is already smokefree, including e-cigarettes).

The policy includes all tobacco products (including smokeless and e-cigs) and indoor and outdoor spaces.  It also prohibits the sale and advertising of tobacco products.  It applies to all UC facilities, including housing, which may make this the largest single expansion of smokefree multiunit housing.

This decision was announced in response to recommendation from the systemwide Smoking Policy Subcommittee of the Occupational Wellness Forum; its report is an excellent resource for people considering similar policies elsewhere. 

UCSF is already smokefree.

There is a good story on this in the San Francisco Chronicle.

January 14, 2012

Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

The University of California Press just published Robert Proctor's new history of the tobacco industry, The Golden Holocaust.  It is the first history to draw heavily on the tobacco industry documents and provides many new insights.

I (and several of our fellows and staff) had an opportunity to review and critique an advanced draft of the book and met with Robert several times to offer feedback.  We all found the book a great read.  There was lots in it that I did not know.

Everyone working on tobacco control should read this book.

Pages